Someone asked me how I manage "running by feel," and I simply said, "it's easy," and that's the beauty of running because running and everything related to it should simple, easy and fun. They asked what type of running I do and when/where/how and I said, I simply have a few combinations of running, based on "feel," which I think equate to 9 types of runs based on effort level and length of run which, by the way, is never pre-determined since I run by feel but I'll jot down what I did post-run.
Here's how I break down my running. I have 3 effort levels: easy effort, medium effort and hard effort, and don't ask me to define each level because it's inside and I know it "by feel," and by my stride, cadence, breathing and overall feel. I also have 3 type of runs in terms of length which I base on time (not distance): short (less than 40 min.), medium (40-60 min.) and long (60+ min.). The efforts levels and run types provide for 9 types of runs (for example, today I ran for 45 min. at medium effort so it was a medium (effort)/medium (length) run; yesterday was a 40 min. easy run so it was a short/easy run).
That's as much science and data that I need as a runner. Ninety percent (90%) of my running is some combination of the easy to medium efforts + short and medium length runs. The "hard" effort and "long" length runs only comprise about 10% of my running otherwise I'd get injured because if that became the majority of my running, I would over-stress the body (and mind).
So there it is for what it's worth. I don't follow complicated training programs and the like because I think they actually do more harm than good. The thing is, if you "run by feel" your body actually does establish a program that is customized for you. For example, if I look my log over the past 12 months, I pretty much do the following over a 12 day cycle of continuous running: 1 long run, 1 hard run, 2 medium run, and 8 easy runs (this is on average). Of course, I have no idea when/where I do my runs as my body & mind decides it on the fly but over a period of time, my running becomes pretty consistent. Then, of course, there's deviations where my body goes off and does things like 50% of my running hard for weeks or 100% easy running for weeks but these are uncommon deviations based on some physical or psychological factors that only my body and mind know and so they steer me a different way for a short period of time to satisfy some internal need and I have reason to question it because it's "based on feel," but over the long haul, definite patterns come to the surface.
Harry
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
There is no shoe worth $100
I don't care who designed it. I don't care what it looks like. I don't care what new cutting age features it might incorporate. I don't care where it's manufactured. I don't care how aesthetically pleasing it may be. All I know is no shoe is worth $100, or anything near that price. It only took me 6+ years to figure that out, all the while I continued to pay stupid amounts of money to various shoe companies. I'll admit, they all are incredible marketing machines and they prey on our innate weakness to acquire the coolest looking thing on the planet, regardless of usability or performance.
I now run in a $29.99 pair of Puma H-Streets (one of the original minimalist running shoes that are basically designed identical to how shoes were designed in the late 60's/early 70's when runners were much healthier and much less injured but that's a topic for another day) and I have about 750 miles on them. Yes, you heard me right. $29.99 AND 750 miles. Hmmm, let's see . . . that's less than $0.04 per mile and with the aid of some cheap shoe gu, they are still going strong and I'll definitely pass the 1,000 mile mark at which point, I'll have paid less than $0.03 per mile, and they'll likely still be going strong. This is the dirty little secret that no shoe company wants you to know. The fact is you don't need their expensive shoes but the vast majority of you will fail to see the light and your pocketbook will suffer as a result.
Forget the discussion about zero drop, minimalism, no heel differential, less cushioning, etc., and just think about the exorbitant prices you pay for running shoes. You have to be kidding me. We were born and designed to run barefoot and somehow we've been sold premier land in the swamps of Florida and we think we discovered the deal of a lifetime. Now, I'll admit, generally the $29.99 was on sale but I never pay more than $50 for the H-Street's as they are commonly available for between $40 - $49.99. Now, the Puma H-Street is not the only option but I'm using it as an example since it's my running shoe of choice. If you think about this minimalist movement, all that's really happened is the shoe companies have made us victims again as they are charging the same high prices for "less" shoe. That's right folks . . . less shoe and we pay the same or more. Of course, that's a great business approach but you need an idiot consumer and there's plenty of those and I was a card carrying member for years until I finally discovered the light. There's nothing pretty about my shoes except they feel great, allow me to run pretty natural and I still can bang out sub 6:00 min. miles, and do all of it injury free. So, in other words they do the job and they do the job cheaply.
I beg of you . . . Free your mind and quit buying into the hype . . . it's all crap. The major shoe companies have done nothing else than repackage crap, remove the smell of crap, and find more idiot consumers to take advantage of . . . quit it!!!
Harry
I now run in a $29.99 pair of Puma H-Streets (one of the original minimalist running shoes that are basically designed identical to how shoes were designed in the late 60's/early 70's when runners were much healthier and much less injured but that's a topic for another day) and I have about 750 miles on them. Yes, you heard me right. $29.99 AND 750 miles. Hmmm, let's see . . . that's less than $0.04 per mile and with the aid of some cheap shoe gu, they are still going strong and I'll definitely pass the 1,000 mile mark at which point, I'll have paid less than $0.03 per mile, and they'll likely still be going strong. This is the dirty little secret that no shoe company wants you to know. The fact is you don't need their expensive shoes but the vast majority of you will fail to see the light and your pocketbook will suffer as a result.
Forget the discussion about zero drop, minimalism, no heel differential, less cushioning, etc., and just think about the exorbitant prices you pay for running shoes. You have to be kidding me. We were born and designed to run barefoot and somehow we've been sold premier land in the swamps of Florida and we think we discovered the deal of a lifetime. Now, I'll admit, generally the $29.99 was on sale but I never pay more than $50 for the H-Street's as they are commonly available for between $40 - $49.99. Now, the Puma H-Street is not the only option but I'm using it as an example since it's my running shoe of choice. If you think about this minimalist movement, all that's really happened is the shoe companies have made us victims again as they are charging the same high prices for "less" shoe. That's right folks . . . less shoe and we pay the same or more. Of course, that's a great business approach but you need an idiot consumer and there's plenty of those and I was a card carrying member for years until I finally discovered the light. There's nothing pretty about my shoes except they feel great, allow me to run pretty natural and I still can bang out sub 6:00 min. miles, and do all of it injury free. So, in other words they do the job and they do the job cheaply.
I beg of you . . . Free your mind and quit buying into the hype . . . it's all crap. The major shoe companies have done nothing else than repackage crap, remove the smell of crap, and find more idiot consumers to take advantage of . . . quit it!!!
Harry
Monday, August 20, 2012
Why running plans just don't work!!!
I know for the vast majority of folks that read this post, it will fall on deaf ears. However, running plans are useless, they really are but it is something we buy into. If you really think about it, our bodies don't perform or adhere to set rules about distance, pace and intensity. In fact, our bodies, being the exceptional devices they are, are too sophisticated for set running plans. In other words, we are trying to dummy down as sophisticated device, which really doesn't make sense.
To tell, and ultimately force, your body to do a set workout on a set day makes no sense "unless" you are a professional elite runner that "must" peak on a specific day and time and, under course of action, you are teetering along the line of disaster and injury. The goal of a professional runner is to push the body to the brink of disaster without crossing the line, all in hopes of peak performance on a specific day and time. For the elite, the risk and reward ratio is worth it. Heck, I would push my body to disaster to win a major professional race and/or an Olympic medal. However, for us mere mortals, to adhere to a modified race plan doesn't make sense.
I spent years, like many of you, running according to a pre-set race plan that would tell me how long, how fast and how often to run. Boy, was a blind but I had nothing else to guide me until I figured out how to "run by feel," which led me to re-discover the amazing structure and design of the human body. When you really "let go," and learn to rely on your own body and natural instincts, a new world is uncovered. I have no idea exactly how far or fast I will run each day but I figure it out during the run because I let me body and mind guide me. Here's the genius in it, we runners often say the body says one thing but the mind say another and that's true when you have blocked communication messages.
When you learn to let go, actually the body and mind align. I know when to take a rest day, for example, and it's based on feel, not how many consecutive days I've run or how fast or slow or how long. It's a feel, that is deep and down to the muscles and tendons. In fact, I can feel my body repair. In fact, today is a prime example, which is why I'm writing this post. Two days again, I was running sub 6:00 per mile pace and today I ran a 10:25 pace. What a delta, right? Well, no, it's because I run by feel. My muscles were tight for Saturday's run and after a warm-up, I knew it was going to be a fast pace run. I also knew by the feel of my "loose" muscles this morning as well as my mental feeling that today was what other runners call a recovery day. I do keep a log and I took a glance, and low and beyond, I've run 9 of the last 10 days which included 2 fast pace days (note: I had not looked at my log in any detail in a while). The point is, I didn't need the data because the data was in my body and mind and the message is clear that tomorrow is a rest day, but not because some running plan pre-decided but my body and mind, in total alignment, decided.
Like I said, very few runners will be willing to take the time to actually learn their own bodies. It's not easy because it takes a completing letting go and 99% of runners are not willing or capable of doing that.
Harry
To tell, and ultimately force, your body to do a set workout on a set day makes no sense "unless" you are a professional elite runner that "must" peak on a specific day and time and, under course of action, you are teetering along the line of disaster and injury. The goal of a professional runner is to push the body to the brink of disaster without crossing the line, all in hopes of peak performance on a specific day and time. For the elite, the risk and reward ratio is worth it. Heck, I would push my body to disaster to win a major professional race and/or an Olympic medal. However, for us mere mortals, to adhere to a modified race plan doesn't make sense.
I spent years, like many of you, running according to a pre-set race plan that would tell me how long, how fast and how often to run. Boy, was a blind but I had nothing else to guide me until I figured out how to "run by feel," which led me to re-discover the amazing structure and design of the human body. When you really "let go," and learn to rely on your own body and natural instincts, a new world is uncovered. I have no idea exactly how far or fast I will run each day but I figure it out during the run because I let me body and mind guide me. Here's the genius in it, we runners often say the body says one thing but the mind say another and that's true when you have blocked communication messages.
When you learn to let go, actually the body and mind align. I know when to take a rest day, for example, and it's based on feel, not how many consecutive days I've run or how fast or slow or how long. It's a feel, that is deep and down to the muscles and tendons. In fact, I can feel my body repair. In fact, today is a prime example, which is why I'm writing this post. Two days again, I was running sub 6:00 per mile pace and today I ran a 10:25 pace. What a delta, right? Well, no, it's because I run by feel. My muscles were tight for Saturday's run and after a warm-up, I knew it was going to be a fast pace run. I also knew by the feel of my "loose" muscles this morning as well as my mental feeling that today was what other runners call a recovery day. I do keep a log and I took a glance, and low and beyond, I've run 9 of the last 10 days which included 2 fast pace days (note: I had not looked at my log in any detail in a while). The point is, I didn't need the data because the data was in my body and mind and the message is clear that tomorrow is a rest day, but not because some running plan pre-decided but my body and mind, in total alignment, decided.
Like I said, very few runners will be willing to take the time to actually learn their own bodies. It's not easy because it takes a completing letting go and 99% of runners are not willing or capable of doing that.
Harry
Friday, June 22, 2012
Why I'm running fast and injury free
As I sipped my pre-run coffee this morning and had my standard discussion with my body before heading out for a run, my body let me know today would be a rest day so I poured a second cup of coffee, relaxed on the couch and watched TV before showering and heading to work. The point is you must learn and understand your body and that takes years and extremely focus and dedication but if you do it, the rewards are huge . . . injuries will be very few and very far between . . .
As fate would have it, this is the quote I read this morning as I decided to take a rest day:
"As I get older, I know I can't keep the same intensity I had
when I was 18. But I trust my strength and endurance and know it's there. So I
swim less, but when I get into the water, my time is more focused. I choose
what I do more carefully to make every exercise and training session count. "Natalie Coughlin, U.S. Olympic swimmer
You just can't continue to put the same level of stress and expectations on your body as you get older "BUT" you can and should demand and strive for excellence . . . nothing changes as you get older except the output but the work, dedication and consistency remands the same . . . or it should. "Output," is nothing more than the by-product of hard work, dedication and striving toward your goals. If you do that, the output is the output and you can't fail. In fact, there's no such thing as failure only setbacks. If you have goals and give your best to achieve those goals, you win every day in life . . . again, output is the output.
Harry
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
We really don't get it . . .
I happened to run into a few of my neighbors as I was beginning my run the other day and something I've noticed is that 99% of runners have no clue how to warm up or even what a warm up is really all about. I'm much faster than my neighbor friends at least at race pace and we were all beginning our run and I refused to keep up with them as they immediately started at something near a 8:00 - 8:30 pace. Similarly, I watch a lot of runners jump out the door of their house and immediately start in the 8:30 pace range which I think is insane. The body hasn't awaken much less warmed up. I tend to start in the 11:00 pace range even on days I'm going to eventually do tempo runs in the 6:00 pace range. I learned this from elite level runners who I watched prod along very slowly during warm-up.
And, another thing, the idea, even as promoted by our running magazines, that a 20 min. warm-up is sufficient is not only wrong, but short sided. It was awhile to warm-up the body correctly before launching into a hard effort workout. I tend to warm-up for 40-45 minutes, followed by some active stretching, before moving into hard effort running. This is likely why I haven't suffered a serious injury in many years. Maybe it's a cultural thing in that we are just too darn impatient to let our bodies warm-up. Or, perhaps, we don't have time and just force the issue instead of waiting until maybe the weekends when we have more time to properly prepare. Or, maybe it's a competitive thing where we can't prod along because our ego's can't handle other runners passing us while we are warming up. I don't know but I do know this is one of the major reasons so many runners are injured on a yearly basis and it won't change because we refuse to practice patience.
Harry
Friday, May 11, 2012
And so the beat goes on . . . the next plateau
No question I've crossed another successful threshold in my running life. It's amazing what you learn about life and yourself from running. A few random things as I continue my journey.
1. In the near ending quest for the perfect running shoe, I found a shoe that surpassed the Nike XC and it's old school. It's the Puma H-Street. Yes, they are back. These are in that group of the original minimalist footwear and was an all-time favorite of ultra runner Anton K. I started running in these puppies several weeks ago and they are excellent. Just a big better than the Nike XC b/c they are lower to the ground, no arch support and they fit my foot like a glove (note: these are not for wider foot folks). This is the new Terra Plana failed to develop with the Evo. This is what the Evo should have been. And the best part, I bought 2 pair for $35 each and they'll last thousands of miles.
2. I don't do the "pain" thing anymore. I'll run hard, although 90% of my running is nice and very easy, but even when I run hard, I will "within my breath" as is preached by Fred Rohe in "The Zen of Running." As a result, I've lost about :30 - :45 sec. per mile when I run hard. I run in the 6:30 pace range vs. 5:45-6:00 pace range but I run longer at that pace and, more importantly, I run happier.
3. I still "run by feel," and it's the best thing I ever decided to do. I run 20, 30, 40 days consecutively and I'm able to do it b/c I run by feel. I do what my body wants to do each day. I don't run with a watch, garmin, heart rate monitor, or any of that crap. All those devices do is block the natural communication path between the body and mind and that's dangerous, in my humble opinion. I basically run for 1 hr. every day and every 7-10 days, I stretch out a 90-100 min. run and only when my body says "go," then I'll throw in some hard runs, generally in the 15-30 min. range.
4. Trails rock, streets suck. If you believe surfaces don't matter in terms of impact to the body, I think you are crazy, at least with respect to this subject.
5. I love life!!! Of course, the main reason is my wonderful wife and beautiful kids but I'll include running b/c it has changed my life. I'm about 5,000 hrs. into running and half way to meeting that 10,000 hr. threshold everyone talks about. I look forward to the journey to that destination but running has made me a better husband, father and person. God gave me the ability to run so I thank God . . . thanks God!!!
Ok, enough and back to life (and running).
Peace,
Harry
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Un-friggin-believable - Pete Magill rocks
Pete Magill: 15:11 for 5K at Age 50
Californian Pete Magill was dominant in the 45-49 age group; for example, he ran 14:45 for 5000 meters in March 2011, three months before turning 50, to become the oldest American to break 15:00 for the distance. He's kept to his record-breaking ways since turning 50, including 
running 15:11.13 for 5000 meters at this weekend’s Oxy Invite in California, under the recognized 50-and-over American record. But, as you'll see in a bit, don't look for Magill's name in the record books for this mark.
running 15:11.13 for 5000 meters at this weekend’s Oxy Invite in California, under the recognized 50-and-over American record. But, as you'll see in a bit, don't look for Magill's name in the record books for this mark.
There’s been an abundance of activity in the 50-plus 5000 in 2012. The American record of 15:41.67 by Mike Heffernan had stood for 20 years until it was lowered by Ken Ernst to 15:34.62 in March and then to a formidable 15:16.77 by Mike Blackmore just a week ago.
Blackmore and Magill will apparently be doing battle in the coming weeks to further lower their times, and ownership of it may pass back and forth between them, with Tony Young, who has just turned 50, possibly joining the fray. But Magill, who is also a terrific Running Times columnist, is making no small plans. Lamenting that he “just got started too late this year” and is “definitely not quite race-fit yet," he declares, 
"I'm going to try to find another 5000 in June, because I think I'm 3 to 4 weeks away from 14:45-14:50." His concern, he says, is that "I honestly think I might not find a decent race."
"I'm going to try to find another 5000 in June, because I think I'm 3 to 4 weeks away from 14:45-14:50." His concern, he says, is that "I honestly think I might not find a decent race."
In any case, from what Magill tells us, his 15:11 may never be considered an "official" record because he finds the ratification procedure to be "a really demeaning process." He explains, "It ultimately requires multiple follow-up phone calls, lots of begging, last-minute reminders at the [USATF] annual meeting where records are ratified, and that's after running around a meet for a couple hours, trying to get people to sign off on all the things that need signing off on (the person who installed the track is supposed to sign off on the track being 400 meters, the starter for the race has to sign, the timer(s), somebody signs to guarantee that the track has proper rails, the meet director, etc.) ... and even then the applications aren't always accepted (and are often misplaced ... often)."
Magill concludes, "Anyway, all that counts is that it gets on the ARRS top times list (they keep selected track times too) and the American Records Wikipedia entry, and I don't need paperwork for that."
Magill is exceptionally fast at 50 but, he says, "The worst part about being a 50-year-old runner is this: The day before the race, for no apparent reason, my legs and feet suddenly got inflamed. It actually hurt to jog. They had improved by race time, but I still had to loosen the laces on my shoes to warm up (you know, just so my feet could fit into them!). It didn't affect my race (exhaustion was much more of a factor). But it was one of those annoying age things that really puts a damper on training and racing enthusiasm."
Sunday, April 29, 2012
H-Streets are back baby!!!
65 min. recovery run in the classic Puma H-Streets:
Walking through the mall, my eyes popped out of my head when I saw the Puma H-Street's back on the market. These are the original minimalist running shoes before all the news fancy stuff that's available today. They are very simple, light (5 oz), with minimal protection and no support. The only downside is they are on the narrow side which isn't an issue for me as I don't have wide feet. I picked up a pair of these puppies for $30 (well, $60 b/c I had to buy 2 pair) and each pair will last well over 2,000 miles (I know folks that have run over 5,000 miles in one pair).
They are very similar to the Nike XC but closer to the ground and cheaper. The XC without the insole is similar to the H-Street with the insole. Without the insole, the H-Street is definitely a more minimalist shoe but without the insole, I can't run on some of the trails so I keep the insole.
I just can't believe they re-released this shoe (of course, they never should have discontinued it . . . these are classics).
Monday, April 9, 2012
What I've learned and lifting is stupid
The other day someone asked me what I’ve learned since I started running about seven years ago and I paused, gathered my thoughts and started to rail off several insights, thoughts and take-aways from my journey. I started years ago at a point where I could barely run 1 mile and turn the clock forward to today as a 42 yr. old runner, I average about 60 miles per week and can still (on occasion) run a sub 18:00 5k. My journey has included practically every injury known to runners, and perhaps to mankind (shod or unshod, I’ve tried almost everything).
With that background, I answered the question with a list of random thoughts . . . came out to a nice round number of 20 (although I have a lot more in my tiny brain) . . .
1. The shod world is full of half truths and half lies and the unshod world is full of half truths and half lies.
2. Barefoot running is extremely valuable even in small does if for nothing else that foot strengthening.
3. The design of the modern shoe is insane. Just stop for 1 minute and think about the design elements in the modern shoe, all of which have no rational relation to the natural functioning of the foot.
4. The idea of focusing on “lifting the foot,” is stupid in my mind. The focus should be on getting the foot on the ground as quickly as possible, and as lightly and softly as possible. This results in a high cadence and shorter stride. The choice is this: lighter impacts but more contacts with the ground or higher impacts but lesser contacts with the ground. You choose.
5. Arms matter and they stabilize your posture. You see runners with arms waiving all over the place. Big mistake.
6. The new wave of minimalist footwear is almost (almost) as stupid as the modern running shoe. Yes, they good intentions for the most part but they are making the same mistake which is failing to logically think about modern running conditions and what the body needs or doesn’t need. For all the new minimalist footwear available, only a few companies get it.
7. Pose and Chi are a complete waste of money and both methods are flawed. Almost I’ll use the word “stupid,” too many times, Pose and Chi are stupid!!! They are nothing more than a ponzi scheme because the reality is you don’t need any class or method to learn how to run.
8. We humans are incredibly lazy, led by my country (the U.S.). We eat too much, never work out, and wonder why our health sucks.
9. The reply “I don’t have time to run” is nothing more than an Excuse!!!
10. Anyone can learn to run well and fast. There’s no question we were born to run.
11. Genetics is way over-rated and like #9, used as an Excuse!!!
12. Technology (GPS watches, HRM, etc.) can be a runners worse enemy.
13. If you truly want to be a talented runner, learn how to “run by feel.” The best runners in the world learned that way because they had no money to buy this type of technology. At the end of the day, there is no technology better than the human body (mind, body and spirit).
14. Check out Barefoot Ken Bob and that’s basically all you need to know about running, whether you run barefoot, in shoes, or a little of both, like me.
15. Running over rocks and difficult while barefoot is stupid unless you like it. There’s no reason to give up all the modern conveniences just to make a point. However, find the most minimalist shoe available that allows you to run where and how you want.
16. There’s no shoe worth more than $80, and this is coming from someone that has purchased thousands of dollars of shoes. Personally, I won’t spend over $60 and I expect the shoe to last at least 1,000 miles but much closer to 2,000 miles.
17. If you do nothing else, lose weight. Weight is a killer, both in life and for running performance. For every 1 lb. imagine running with a 1 lb. weight and so on. While 10 lbs. doesn’t sound like a lot, it’s a TON and I had to find out the hard way.
18. There is no sport on the face of this earth that is easier to do than running . . . just head right out your door and if you don’t need 10 minutes to go through a checklist of useless technology, all you need is clothes and shoes, or just your bare feet.
19. Gordon Pirie was way before his time. For free, you can download and read the best book on running . . . “Running Fast and Injury Free.”
20. As in life, it’s all about sacrifice and priorities.
Harry
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Why we are over-weight
Well, generally speaking and specific conditions excluded, we eat too damn much. I got a bit lazy with my eating and quickly gained 10 lbs. I'm usually about 160 lbs. at 6 ft. and I quickly gained 10 lbs. just eating too much and quickly found out it was too much added weight for my running regime.
Harry
In the past, I had a simple rule. Only eat 50-75% of what's on my plate especially since here in America the restaurants give us ungodly servings anyway. Well, I started to eat it all and there you go. This week and went back to eating 50% of what's on my plate and I almost immediately lost 5 lbs. and I still feel great. Of course, it's also about what you eat as much as how much you eat.
I generally follow 2 simple rules. Don't eat fast food which I haven't done in 5+ years and eat 50-75% of what you are given . . . try it.
Harry
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Technology Killed the Runner just like Video Killed the Radio Star . . .
It seems like every runner I pass has more and more crap (or I guess you call it technology) on their bodies. Everything from iPods to GPS watches to Heart Rate Monitors to belt clips and the list goes on and on. One would believe that we never were able to just run without help from one or more of these gadgets.
While I don't run with any of that crap (sorry, technology) as I believe in learning to run naturally which is all about "running by feel," which includes mental, spiritual and physical awareness, I found myself using a compression sock a few days ago and after a few days I ripped that bad boy off and let me body naturally do its thing and a few days later, everything is fine again. We just refuse to acknowledge or believe in the ability of the human body. The human body is one of the most amazing devices in the galaxy but we like to (try to) be smarter than we actually are . . . we are commonly to smart for our own good.
When is the last time you went running with nothing more than clothes and a pair of shoes (or barefoot for my barefoot friends)? No watch, no HRM, etc. . . . nothing but yourself while would require you to listen to your body and try to interrupt the messages it is sending you. Do you have any idea how many messages the body sends the brain while running in just 30 minutes . . . thousands of messages but it does no good if we block all those messages.
Harry
Thursday, February 9, 2012
I don't have time to run . . . I call BS
I came across this quote today which I'm going to use for all those folks that can't understand how I find time to run. I'm sure many of you have been asked the same question and it's funny because I always look at the person like, "are you serious? no way you can't find time to run." I rarely find someone who doesn't have time to run. It's generally a question of desire and will . . . most people can find 30-45 min. in a day to run but it may require getting up earlier, staying up later, or giving something up, but there's always time . . .
"If running is important to you, then your mind-set shifts from "Can I find time for it?" to "When can I find time for it?" You think in terms not of "Will I run today?" but "When will I run today?"
Harry
"If running is important to you, then your mind-set shifts from "Can I find time for it?" to "When can I find time for it?" You think in terms not of "Will I run today?" but "When will I run today?"
Harry
Friday, January 27, 2012
Don't lose too much weight . . . running alone only takes you so far . . .
I met Teresa in Denver last summer while she was attending a
conference that included Dr. Lieberman. We had a fascinating
discussion and she talked a lot about all around conditioning and
being in good shape from activities beyond just running including
weight lifting. I thought about it for months and when my weight
dropped to early 150 lbs. (I'm 6ft.), I just didn't feel right and I
felt weak although my running was fine as was my performance times,
but I still didn't feel strong (and I didn't feel right).
So, I started core work and upper body lifting (light stuff; not for
muscle but for strength) and within 6 weeks, I gained back 15-20 lbs.
I now float between 165-170 lbs. and I feel stronger than ever, and I
feel much better as a runner. Another benefit, my wife is very
happy :) . . . she describes me as looking like a 800 meter runner as
opposed to a marathoner and that's what she likes and I honestly have
to agree . . . throughout the day, I'm just stronger. I didn't change
anything other than adding the core and upper body workouts.
I share this to thank Teresa as we all help each other on this site
and I also want to thank Sean b/c I've watched his dailymile workouts
and he does a great job of all around conditioning and having meet
Sean in person, he is in great shape and strong. I also share this as
it may resonate with others. You see all the super skinny runners and
yes, losing weight does help running and even speed perhaps but
there's a break point where you can go too far.
I'm finally back to my effortless running, just floating along. So
thanks to Teresa and Sean and maybe this helps someone else.
Harry
conference that included Dr. Lieberman. We had a fascinating
discussion and she talked a lot about all around conditioning and
being in good shape from activities beyond just running including
weight lifting. I thought about it for months and when my weight
dropped to early 150 lbs. (I'm 6ft.), I just didn't feel right and I
felt weak although my running was fine as was my performance times,
but I still didn't feel strong (and I didn't feel right).
So, I started core work and upper body lifting (light stuff; not for
muscle but for strength) and within 6 weeks, I gained back 15-20 lbs.
I now float between 165-170 lbs. and I feel stronger than ever, and I
feel much better as a runner. Another benefit, my wife is very
happy :) . . . she describes me as looking like a 800 meter runner as
opposed to a marathoner and that's what she likes and I honestly have
to agree . . . throughout the day, I'm just stronger. I didn't change
anything other than adding the core and upper body workouts.
I share this to thank Teresa as we all help each other on this site
and I also want to thank Sean b/c I've watched his dailymile workouts
and he does a great job of all around conditioning and having meet
Sean in person, he is in great shape and strong. I also share this as
it may resonate with others. You see all the super skinny runners and
yes, losing weight does help running and even speed perhaps but
there's a break point where you can go too far.
I'm finally back to my effortless running, just floating along. So
thanks to Teresa and Sean and maybe this helps someone else.
Harry
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Is heel striking bad?
This was a question someone asked me yesterday. I know there's a lot of discussion recently around heel striking but the easy answer is "yes," but that's not the complete answer. The answer is "how do you run naturally?" And, if you run naturally one way, and a different way wearing shoes, then that's bad. So what is running naturally? Well, I'd argue that when we are barefoot, we are in our natural state. We were born to run without Nike's correct? And we have ancestors that lived barefoot. In fact, shoes were developed to address issues with weather and terrain so if you negate those impacts and have excellent weather and save terrain, natural running would be barefoot running.
Ok, now that we've established that, how do you land while barefoot? If you naturally land with a heel strike and there's no impacts in terms of injury or pain, then I would answer that "heel striking is not bad" at least for you. However, you likely land differently while barefoot vs. shod and if that's the case and if the difference is you land forefoot or mid-foot while barefoot but heel strike in shoes, then "yes, heel striking is bad."
With that said, I've come across runners that do heel strike while barefoot and Dr. Lieberman found runners in Kenya that did just that although he said they were rare (basically outliers). So if you are a outlier, then heel striking may be natural to you although it's likely such folks land very lightly thus reducing the impact forces at landing.
So what's the point? The point is let's stop with starting the conversation with foot strike and simply ask "how do we run naturally." Shouldn't our goal be to run naturally as that is how we were designed. Of course if you believe the human body is flawed by design then this means nothing to you but I certainly believe the human body is one of my most incredibly designed devices in the world.
What's your position?
Harry
Ok, now that we've established that, how do you land while barefoot? If you naturally land with a heel strike and there's no impacts in terms of injury or pain, then I would answer that "heel striking is not bad" at least for you. However, you likely land differently while barefoot vs. shod and if that's the case and if the difference is you land forefoot or mid-foot while barefoot but heel strike in shoes, then "yes, heel striking is bad."
With that said, I've come across runners that do heel strike while barefoot and Dr. Lieberman found runners in Kenya that did just that although he said they were rare (basically outliers). So if you are a outlier, then heel striking may be natural to you although it's likely such folks land very lightly thus reducing the impact forces at landing.
So what's the point? The point is let's stop with starting the conversation with foot strike and simply ask "how do we run naturally." Shouldn't our goal be to run naturally as that is how we were designed. Of course if you believe the human body is flawed by design then this means nothing to you but I certainly believe the human body is one of my most incredibly designed devices in the world.
What's your position?
Harry
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
the mojo is back . . .
It was a long journey to get my mojo back. My running has been fine but something has been off ever since I decided, for not apparent reason, to make a few tweaks to my running form to see what would happen. Well, the old saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix it," is a ageless saying for a reason. Maybe they should change it to, "if it ain't broke and you change it, you are a dumb ass."
Specifically, I switched from my natural forefoot landing to a mid-foot/whole foot landing and lowered the carriage of my arms. My thought was the former would be easier on my achilles (even though I had no achilles issues) and the latter would improve Vo2 max as it has been reported by Ryan Hall's dad when he recommended that Ryan run with a lower arm carriage. Well, this didn't work for me and I lost that feeling of running completely effortlessly but I finally regained it when I significantly increased my barefoot mileage and stopped with those changes and one day (a few weeks ago actually) I finally felt that effortless running again and it has been the same ever since. It is truly magical to float along and to feel effortless while you run, whether running faster or slower. I've also accepted where my shoe journey has rested.
I've tried really hard to run in true minimalist footwear but it's too hard on my body. I think it has to do with my personal resonance frequency and for whatever reason the Nike Zoom Streak XC which would be ultra minimal for 99% of runners fits me perfectly as does Barefoot Ted's Luna sandals. I feel great when running barefoot on the treadmill and whatever frequency level that creates is the frequency level I need to maintain while shod and it stays within accepted levels while running in the Nike XC's or Luna's. I can't explain it and I don't care to since it works.
However, I never imagined ending up in Nike's when I started this journey almost 6 years ago. In some corners of the minimalist world the word "Nike," will get you into some serious hot water but so be it, that's what works for me. Now, granted, the Nike Zoom Steak XC is a 5.4 oz. ultra light weight minimalist racing flat (only a 3mm heel differential) so we are slicing hairs in some respects. The great news is the Nike XC is commonly available for under $50 and I've but well over 1,500 miles on a single pair, and it's excellent on all surfaces from roads to trails.
As for walking, my go to walking shoe is the Inov-8 F-Lite 195. I love that shoe for walking as it feels great. It's light, flexible yet provides adequate protection for all surfaces and environments.
Well that's the current update . . . I'm floating along with a smile on my face in bright green Nike's or my Jesus sandals (Luna's) . . .
Harry
Specifically, I switched from my natural forefoot landing to a mid-foot/whole foot landing and lowered the carriage of my arms. My thought was the former would be easier on my achilles (even though I had no achilles issues) and the latter would improve Vo2 max as it has been reported by Ryan Hall's dad when he recommended that Ryan run with a lower arm carriage. Well, this didn't work for me and I lost that feeling of running completely effortlessly but I finally regained it when I significantly increased my barefoot mileage and stopped with those changes and one day (a few weeks ago actually) I finally felt that effortless running again and it has been the same ever since. It is truly magical to float along and to feel effortless while you run, whether running faster or slower. I've also accepted where my shoe journey has rested.
I've tried really hard to run in true minimalist footwear but it's too hard on my body. I think it has to do with my personal resonance frequency and for whatever reason the Nike Zoom Streak XC which would be ultra minimal for 99% of runners fits me perfectly as does Barefoot Ted's Luna sandals. I feel great when running barefoot on the treadmill and whatever frequency level that creates is the frequency level I need to maintain while shod and it stays within accepted levels while running in the Nike XC's or Luna's. I can't explain it and I don't care to since it works.
However, I never imagined ending up in Nike's when I started this journey almost 6 years ago. In some corners of the minimalist world the word "Nike," will get you into some serious hot water but so be it, that's what works for me. Now, granted, the Nike Zoom Steak XC is a 5.4 oz. ultra light weight minimalist racing flat (only a 3mm heel differential) so we are slicing hairs in some respects. The great news is the Nike XC is commonly available for under $50 and I've but well over 1,500 miles on a single pair, and it's excellent on all surfaces from roads to trails.
As for walking, my go to walking shoe is the Inov-8 F-Lite 195. I love that shoe for walking as it feels great. It's light, flexible yet provides adequate protection for all surfaces and environments.
Well that's the current update . . . I'm floating along with a smile on my face in bright green Nike's or my Jesus sandals (Luna's) . . .
Harry
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
